cover image Reason in the Balance: The Case Against Naturalism in Science, Law & Education

Reason in the Balance: The Case Against Naturalism in Science, Law & Education

Phillip Johnson. InterVarsity Press, $19.99 (245pp) ISBN 978-0-8308-1610-1

Johnson (Darwin on Trial) fires a major salvo in the culture wars with this sweeping critique of the reigning materialist philosophy. According to this UC Berkeley law professor, ``naturalism''--the belief that all of reality can ultimately be explained in purely physical terms and that God is merely a projection of human desires--dominates our universities, public schools, sciences and professions. Yet most Americans, he maintains, are--like him--theists, Christian or otherwise, and believe in a supernatural God who created humanity for a purpose. Not always convincingly, he links naturalist assumptions to the pro-choice position on abortion, to Marxism, to popular culture's self-indulgent hedonism, to the ethical relativism of philosopher Richard Rorty and to judicial decisions to ban from schools the teaching of religious viewpoints. Doing battle with evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould, astrophysicist Stephen Hawking and other scientists, Johnson calls for a scientifically informed theology to study the interaction of God and the supernatural with the whole of creation. $30,000 ad/promo; Conservative Book Club main selection; author tour. (Aug.)